I scored a 175 on the LSAT® in ten weeks, without a $10,000 course.
Now I'm teaching you exactly how I did it — the same method, the same drills, the same patterns — without the gap year, the fear-mongering, or the price tag.
Become A Founding Student Limited founding cohort. Then the price goes back to $1,997.The LSAT® industry doesn't actually want you to do well. It wants you to be afraid.
Scared students buy $10,000 courses. Scared students take gap years. Scared students hire tutors at $365 an hour and re-sign every quarter. Fear is the business model for these big companies — it isn't mine.
What they want you to believe
- You need 12–18 months of study to be "competitive"
- You can't do it without a $5K–$15K course
- You should take a gap year to "really focus"
- It's 170 or your career is over
- The LSAT® measures something deep about you
- The system is too complex to figure out alone
What's actually true
- I did it in roughly ten weeks while in school
- I spent $0 on tutoring or prep companies
- Gap years are a luxury sold as a necessity
- ~1% of test-takers hit 170. Stop pretending it's normal.
- It's a learnable test. Not a measure of your worth.
- It's a pattern. I cracked it. I wrote it down.
I'm Ava. I'm a college student who beat the LSAT® industry at its own game.
Two and a half months of self-study. Zero dollars on tutoring. A score in the top 1%. And, somewhere along the way, a quiet decision that I wasn't going to let the next pre-law student get scared into spending $10,000 on the same fear-marketed prep courses I refused to buy.
How a remote proctor and five unanswered questions accidentally started this whole thing.
The first time I took the LSAT®, I got locked out of my own test with five questions left on the screen.
Six hours of staring at a monitor. A proctor who treated me like a cheater. Tech glitches that ate my final section. By the end of it I was on the phone with my parents trying not to cry, telling them I'd just thrown away months of work because some software couldn't keep me logged in.
I was crushed. My dad told me not to give up, but I had been trying to log back in for hours. I knew it was over.
What I didn't know — and what the LSAT® corporation doesn't exactly advertise — was that I could request a retest. Two days later I was sitting in an in-person testing center down the street, having done zero additional prep, because I'd already burned through every drop of stress I had. I told myself: whatever happens, it can't be worse than Friday.
My retest was a breeze by comparison. The proctors treated me like a human being. I had minutes to spare on every section. I went home, didn't think about it, and a couple weeks later, I woke up to a notification that scores had been released.
Here's what nobody tells you about that score: I'm not a genius. I'm not a "natural test-taker." I went to a normal college, I have a normal brain, and I had a normal amount of time. What I had was a method — one I'd reverse-engineered from scratch over about ten weeks while everyone around me was telling me it couldn't be done that way.
And after I got the score, the strangest thing happened. A family friend — the kind of helicopter parent with a pre-law daughter who'd been white-knuckling this stuff for years — reached out and told me I should go work for one of those big LSAT® companies. They'd "pay me well," she said. They'd "open doors."
But that's not my way.
I'd just spent ten weeks watching the entire prep industry try to scare me out of doing exactly what I ended up doing. Why would I go work for them? Why would I help them tell another generation of pre-law students that the only way through this test is the most expensive, slowest, most fear-soaked way possible?
So instead, I wrote down everything I did. Every framework. Every drill. Every shortcut. Every "wait, that actually worked?" moment. I built it into a course, a community, a study tracker, and a weekly live session with me — the whole system I wish I'd had when I started.
It's called The 175 Method. And right now, I'm accepting a small group of founding students who get the entire thing for $500.
The three foundations that turn the LSAT® from a wall into a pattern.
The 175 Method isn't a pile of tricks or a 600-page logic textbook. It's three things the prep companies won't teach you — because if they did, you wouldn't need them.
Reading Endurance: The skill nobody calls a skill.
Here's the thing nobody in the prep industry will tell you: the LSAT® isn't really a logic test. It's a reading test wearing a logic costume. Logical reasoning, reading comprehension — the entire exam is built on your ability to read carefully, sustain focus, and not lose the thread on dense text for hours at a time. That's it. That's the whole game.
Most students never train this directly. They drill question types, memorize logic rules, hammer flashcards. None of it builds the underlying skill the test is actually measuring. I'll show you the exact reading habit I used — yes, it involves fiction, and yes, that sounds counterintuitive — that built my focus from "phone-scrolling teenager" to "four full sections without flinching." This is the move that quietly does more for your score than any tactic in the major prep books.
Banana Split Sentences: Translating LSAT® into English.
LSAT® sentences are designed to feel impossible. They're written in a deliberately tangled academic register, packed with qualifiers and double negatives and clauses inside clauses inside clauses. The first time you see one, your brain just slides off. That's by design.
Once you know how to break them down — literally how to translate LSAT-speak into plain English, one chunk at a time — the "hard" questions stop being hard. They become easy questions disguised in expensive-sounding language. This is the core decoding move that changed my score the most, and it's the thing my students mention first when I ask what clicked.
Pattern Recognition: Stop solving. Start recognizing.
Big prep companies will hand you a 200-page rulebook to memorize. Conditional logic, contrapositives, formal logic notation, an entire vocabulary of terms you'll never use anywhere else in your life. I'm going to hand you four patterns instead.
Once you can spot them, you stop "solving" questions and start recognizing them. You see a stimulus and your brain immediately knows what kind of trap you're walking into. That's the difference between a 160 and a 170+ — not more rules, not more tricks, just the pattern recognition that comes from seeing the same shapes over and over until they're obvious. I'll teach you the shapes.
Everything you get when you join The 175 Method.
This is the complete system. Not a teaser. Not a "module 1, upgrade for the rest." Everything I used, everything I built, and direct access to me — for founding students only.
Here's everything included.
-
The Full 175 Method Course My complete curriculum — every framework, every drill, every pattern I used to score in the top 1%. Self-paced video lessons, broken into modules you can move through as fast or as slow as you need.$1,997 value
-
The 175 Tracker (Web App) A custom web app I built specifically for my students. Practice test score tracking, error logging, weak-area diagnosis, and study session logs — so you can stop guessing whether you're improving and actually see it.$197 value
-
Weekly Live Study Sessions With Me Every week, I jump on a live call with the founding cohort. Real questions, real LSAT® problems, real-time feedback. Not pre-recorded. Not a TA. Me.$1,200 value
-
The Private 175 Method Community A focused community of people studying the same way you are. Share scores, ask questions, post wins, and get help between live sessions. No randos, no fear-mongering.$497 value
-
Founding Student Lifetime Access Everything you join with today, you keep forever — including all future updates to the course, tracker, and curriculum. No re-billing. No expiring access.Priceless
I'm not going to promise you a 175. Here's what I will promise.
The 14-Day Method Promise
Go through the first two modules. Show up to one live session. Use the 175 Tracker on a real practice test. If after 14 days you don't believe this is a smarter, calmer, more honest way to study for the LSAT® than anything else you've tried — email me and I'll refund every cent. No forms. No "exit interviews." No guilt trips. I'd rather have your trust than your $500.
This isn't for everyone. And I'm not going to pretend it is.
If you want someone to hold your hand for 18 months, tell you you're special, and charge you $14,000 for the privilege — I am genuinely not your person. There are companies that do that. They have nicer websites than mine.
The 175 Method is for the kind of person who looks at a $10,000 prep course and thinks, "there has to be a smarter way." Who's willing to actually do the work but doesn't want to lose a year of their life doing it. Who wants the test demystified, not dramatized.
If that's you — the founding cohort is the right next step. And it's only the right next step while there are still spots open.
Straight answers from Ava.
"Why is it $500 if it's worth almost $4,000?"
Because you're a founding student. You're getting in early — before there are dozens of named testimonials, before the case studies pile up, before the price increases I already know are coming. In exchange, I get your honest feedback, your results, and (hopefully) your story. After the founding cohort closes, the price goes to $1,997 and stays there. That's not a fake countdown — that's just how this works.
"Are you going to promise me a 175?"
No. Anyone promising you a specific score is either lying to you or has a guarantee buried under so many conditions it might as well not exist. What I will tell you is that this is the method I used to get mine, that I'm a normal person with a normal brain, and that the framework is repeatable. Your score is on you. The method is on me.
"Two to three months — really? Be honest."
Really. I took the LSAT® in November 2025, and that was my actual prep window. I'm not selling you a story from 2018. The catch is that "two to three months" is real focused work, not casual. The course walks you through exactly what that looks like.
"What if I've already started studying or already took it once?"
Probably even more reason to join. A lot of the people I work with are retakers who did the "right thing" the first time — bought the big course, followed the schedule, plateaued anyway. Coming in with prior context usually helps you see what's been getting in your way.
"How do the weekly live sessions actually work?"
One live call a week with me, on Zoom, for the founding cohort. We work through real LSAT® questions, I clarify whatever you're stuck on, and we workshop the patterns together. If you can't make a session live, every call is recorded and posted in the community within 24 hours.
"What's the 175 Tracker?"
A web app I had built specifically for my students. You log your practice tests, and it shows you your score trend, your confidence trend, your weakest question types, and where to focus next. It's the thing I wish I'd had when I was studying on my own with a half-broken Google Sheet.
"What if it's not for me?"
You have 14 days. Go through two modules, show up to one live session, run a practice test through the tracker. If it's not the right fit, email me and I'll refund you in full. No questions asked. No "well, did you really try?" I'd rather you walk away than feel stuck.
You can keep googling. Or you can join the cohort.
It took me ten weeks to build this method from nothing. Most students I talk to have been "thinking about studying for the LSAT®" for months — collecting tabs, watching free YouTube videos, downloading PDFs, and not actually getting anywhere.
If that's where you are right now, I'd rather you join the founding cohort and get unstuck than keep doing what isn't working. If you're willing to do the actual work, I'll teach you everything I know.